Queensland Government Shelves Plans To Amend Property Valuation Laws

May 9, 2024 Edward Dever

Last week, the Queensland Government shelved proposed land valuation amendments under the Land Valuation Amendment Bill 2023.

Resources Minister Scott Stewart pulled the proposed amendments for further consultation and revision, a process which should push out any progress beyond the October 2024 State election. It is not clear whether a future LNP Government (if elected) will proceed with the amendments.

Much of the stakeholder feedback on the Bill centred on the introduction of binding Valuer-General guidelines for valuations with concern raised that there would be no prior consultation and future guidelines could enhance property values resulting in higher land taxes and Council rates.

Also of concern was the proposal to remove the $750,000 threshold which requires a person objecting to a valuation to advise the Valuer-General of the valuation sought. This would require all landowners to state the valuation sought in their objection and would increase the costs of lodging an objection.

Changes to the definition of “unencumbered” were also considered controversial, resulting in uncertainty over how land is to be valued.

Qld land valuation laws shelved by government following input from property industry

May 2024

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Further Proposed Changes to Queensland Residential Tenancy Legislation

April 2, 2024 Edward Dever

On 21 March 2024, the Queensland Government introduced the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024.

The Bill’s purpose is to further strengthen tenants’ rights and stabilise rents in the private rental market.

The proposed amendments include:

- adopting a standard rental application form (as yet only partially specified) which limits the information a tenant need provide.

- applying the 12 month rent increase restriction to the property rather than the lease, regardless of a change in property ownership. Lease breaks may lead to rent increases during future lease terms rather than at the commencement of the lease term.

- requiring leases to state the date of last rent increase, with tenants permitted to request evidence of such increase. Existing leases are exempt.

- prohibiting rent bidding, including accepting an unsolicited offer higher than advertised.

- capping reletting costs in the event of a lease break.

- legislating that a landlord cannot act unreasonably in refusing a tenant’s request to attach a fixture or make structural changes to the premises relating to safety, security and accessibility. Tenants may seek recourse through QCAT if denied approval.

- capping rent in advance payments to a maximum of 4 weeks rent - the amendment changes the prohibition on requiring an advance payment to accepting an advance payment. This may necessitate refunds in certain circumstances to prevent breaches although perhaps less problematic with periodic payment arrangements.

- adding new time limits for the provision of water service charges payable by a tenant.

One of the Bill’s stated aims is to improve the rental experience for Queensland renters and property owners. Some landlords may contend that the seemingly endless legislative amendments are having the opposite effect. Agents are also facing more compliance tasks and complicated leasing arrangements.

The deadline for submissions on the Bill is 10 April 2024.

RTA - Have your say on new rental law reforms

April 2024

Virtual Silence on Regional Air Pollution at 2024 ASEAN-Australia Special Summit

March 8, 2024 Edward Dever

The ASEAN-Australia Special Summit was held in Melbourne on 4-6 March 2024.

If attendees had cast an eye over NASA's regional map before the various events, they would have seen a region consumed by agricultural burning-off and forest fires. It might have provoked the odd question of leaders attending the Summit.

Fires across South East Asia are an annual event which choke the region and affect the health of tens of millions of people. During this time, the level of fine inhalable particles is many times higher than the WHO recommended level, resulting in increased respiratory-related illnesses.

While Thailand has a new draft Clean Air Act approved by Cabinet, each year politicians make broad statements about tackling air pollution and invoke feel good but otherwise useless temporary measures such as spraying water mist into the air.

Much of the air pollution is linked to agricultural burn-off, particularly in the sugar cane sector. Burning off is a cheap solution where farmers don't have the financial resources for more environmentally friendly farming practices. Some change is occurring. Another significant air pollution source is deliberately lit forest fires.

A key issue is enforcement of existing laws. Closer regional co-operation is also needed.

There is a brief mention of regional air pollution or 'transboundary haze pollution' in Item 42 of the Melbourne Declaration.

In a somewhat woolly statement, the ASEAN leaders look forward to exploring cooperation in addressing transboundary haze pollution, including the establishment and operationalisation of the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Transboundary Haze Pollution Control (ACCTHPC).

While ASEAN leaders kick the issue down the road and hold hands in Melbourne, people in South East Asia choke through another smog-filled day.

ASEAN Melbourne Statement

NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System

March 2024

The Lithium-ion Battery Condundrum Facing Landlords

January 12, 2024 Edward Dever

The increased use of lithium-ion powered devices such as e-scooters presents a conundrum for landlords and strata committees.

A rise in the number of lithium-ion linked fires in homes is occurring amid a vacuum of government standards for dealing with these risks.

"Research by the organisation EV Fire Safe found that if a battery goes into thermal runaway inside a home, there is a 64% chance of being injured and requiring hospitalisation, and a 7.8% chance of death."

While there are some fire extinguishers available to suppress lithium-ion fires, in the absence of government standards, some fire safety consultants are currently reluctant to make specific recommendations in relation to lithium-ion fires.

In the linked article, Professor Christensen advises that lithium-ion devices should only be charged outside.

The Owners Corporation Network, an independent body representing apartment owners, has now made a similar recommendation.

But how practical is this suggestion in the context of apartment living? And are landlords and strata committees really aware of the number of devices currently used in their properties? (OCN has suggested that strata management maintain e-scooter and e-bike registers.)

Given the number of devices in properties across Australia, the risk seems relatively small at present but experts warn the risk increases where people use cheaper mismatched chargers or engage in unsafe charging practices.

Fire blankets commonly available are inadequate for dealing with lithium-ion related fires. Fire blankets capable of suppressing lithium-ion fires are coming to market but are generally not of an appropriate size or realistically priced for home use. Over time, this should change.

The insurance sector appears silent on the issue. But there is a risk of fires from lithium-ion batteries forming an exclusion from future policy coverage or at least a reluctance on the part of insurance companies to honour coverage if (as yet undefined) appropriate charging practices are not followed.

In the meantime, landlords and strata committees await the development of appropriate government standards for charging lithium-ion devices and dealing with related fires.

The ‘ticking time bombs’ inside Aussie homes sparking a rising number of fires

Owners Corporation Network proposes new e-bike, e-scooter rules

January 2024

Greens Target Brisbane LGA Rent Freeze

November 8, 2023 Edward Dever

To date, The Greens have tried and failed twice to implement a rent freeze in Queensland and once at the Federal level. In this latest attempt, 2024 Greens Lord Mayoral candidate Jonathan Sriranganathan plans to implement a two-year rent freeze on residential properties in the Brisbane local government area, backdated to January 2023. This assumes The Greens control Brisbane City Council after the election in March 2024.

To implement their plan, The Greens propose to control rents via penalty rates applied to any investor who raises rents above January 2023 levels. Rental properties where rent has increased would be "reclassified into the new ‘Uncapped rental home’ rating category."

The penalty is an additional 650% of the current rates bill so the total rates bill would be 750% higher following The Greens' market intervention. Using The Greens' example of a unit rented for $750 per week with a rates bill of $1,500 per year, any rent increase would result in an extra rates bill of $9,750, with a total rates bill of $11,250.

Any landlord who has increased rent with the tenant's agreement between January 2023 and the Council election in March 2024 would be penalised, whether that rent increase was less than 1% or 30%.

The Greens' plan is to apply the rent freeze to the property rather than the tenancy and to use median suburb rents for any new build or substantial renovation.

Penalty rates are claimed to be revenue neutral as the Greens contend that landlords will not put up rents. However this ignores the fact that many landlords will have raised rents over the 15 month period prior to the 2024 Council election.

Landlords in Brisbane (and elsewhere in Queensland) are currently subject to an effective 12 month rent freeze following the State Government's amendments to the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act preventing landlords from increasing the rent within a 12 month period.

Rent controls in other jurisdictions (such as Ireland and San Francisco) have resulted in reduced residential rental supply as landlords change use to avoid the controls or sell out of the market. It also acts as a disincentive for new investment builds. (Note that The Greens plan to increase rates for Airbnb-style properties by 1,000%.)

Any developer who views The Greens as potentially controlling Brisbane City Council post-March 2024 is likely to look more favourable at projects outside the Brisbane LGA (e.g. Redcliffe, Logan, Ipswich) rather than risk the imposition of a two-year rent freeze on their projects.

Similar to the Queensland government's proposed (then scrapped) land tax changes, the prospect of a rent freeze throughout Brisbane is likely to alter investors' decisions well ahead of any actual imposition of a freeze.

Lord Mayoral candidate Jonathan Sriranganathan proposes two-year rent freeze in Brisbane

Freeze Rents in Brisbane: No more unlimited rent increases

November 2023

Historical Flaws in Malaysia's Torrens System?

October 24, 2023 Edward Dever

There are plenty of issues in Australia with poorly completed strata residential apartments. Owners are left saddled with huge defect repair bills after the developer has been liquidated or otherwise managed to avoid liability.

But imagine losing access to your apartment because the developer retained ownership of the common property and subsequently sold it to a third party.

That is the case in Malaysia with the saga of Sea Park Apartments where, due to the laws at the time, the developer was able to separately strata title six blocks of apartments while retaining ownership of the common area land, including the car parks and essential services such as sewerage and fire hydrants.

Crucial building plans which may have assisted apartment owners in their court battle mysteriously disappeared from the local Council and the Land Office.

The Sea Park Apartments saga has gone on for almost 20 years. In hindsight, the strata owners probably should have closed the transaction at the time the developer offered to sell the common areas to them in order to make the best of a bad situation. However, as the strata owners always thought they collectively owned the common areas (and only received their freehold titles a few years prior to the offer), one could understand any reluctance. Apparently, the main issue was the vehicle to be used for common property ownership.

For residents who live there, some for over 40 years, there seems no end in sight for this dispute.

The Apartments With No Entrance

October 2023

Ineffective Strata Minority Cram Down Rule Creates Problems

October 4, 2023 Edward Dever

The Queensland Government may wish to cast an eye towards NSW before finalising amendments to its strata legislation which will permit 75% of owners to terminate uneconomic community title schemes.

On 24 August 2023, the Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 was introduced into the Queensland Parliament. The Bill was referred to the Legal Affairs and Safety Committee for detailed consideration. The closing date for written submissions was a mere nine days later on 2 September. The Qld Law Society raised concerns in their submission regarding the short timeframe.

Under the proposed Queensland amendments, minority unit owners may be forced to sell their units in circumstances where there are economic reasons for terminating the scheme supported by 75% of the scheme owners.

This reform was described as "deliver[ing] a key action of the 2022 Queensland Housing Summit by reforming the BCCM Act to allow for termination of uneconomic community titles schemes to facilitate renewal and redevelopment."

The Bill's Explanatory Notes specifically refer to "having regard to the New South Wales approach."

The only problem is that terminating schemes in NSW has not been that simple with only a handful of schemes apparently managing to negotiate a sale. Developers are now saying they "aren't interested in buying older buildings unless there’s 100 per cent agreement from owners to sell."

Designed to protect the elderly owner from unscrupulous developers, at least in one instance in NSW, the reverse seems to have occurred - protecting a rival developer from the building's elderly owners. The NSW amendments have not prevented strategic blocking attempts by competing developers.

The NSW Minister for Better Regulation and Fair Trading has vowed to fix the glitches. “The NSW government is committed to updating and reforming this system, including fixing the loopholes that have made it out of date."

Perhaps the Queensland Government will revisit its amendments before passing a Bill with baked-in glitches, at least based on the NSW experience.

The Legal Affairs and Safety Committee is due to hand down its Report on 6 October.

This law was meant to solve Sydney’s housing crisis. It’s left owners devastated

Legal Affairs And Safety Committee - Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023

October 2023

Shadowy Chinese Firms That Own Chunks Of Cambodia

October 1, 2023 Edward Dever

Interesting BBC piece on exploitation of Cambodia's resources. The only thing that seems to have changed over the past 30 years is the nationality of those doing the exploiting.

In the mid to late 1990s, French and Malaysian investors attempted, often successfully, to take advantage of Cambodian government officials.

Almost 30 years later, it is Chinese investors although they now deal with a far more sophisticated government apparatus as indicated by the increasing wealth disparity between Cambodian government and business figures and the rest of the population.

Looking back at the land speculation deals dressed up as rice farming projects and the favourable airport concession arrangements, one ultimately unsuccessful deal stands out.

In late 1996 and early 1997, there was a grand plan to erect a sound and light show at Angkor Wat. This proposal would have seen management of the temple complex outsourced to a Malaysian conglomerate which would have had full authority over the area. Cambodians were to be excluded from their own temple other than on particular religious holidays. The Malaysian group was to have total control over the content of the sound and light show and would be entitled to make modifications to the temple complex as they erected their equipment and built fencing.

Equally concerning was the plan to build hotels right up to the front of Angkor Wat, a detrimental step that was unlikely to have ever been reversed.

The contract was a particularly one-sided affair with the Cambodians effectively ceding sovereignty over Angkor to a foreign corporation.

The deal reached an impasse and, in the second half of 1997, an economic tsunami hit Asia. A number of Asian economies fell like dominoes commencing with Thailand. Malaysia enacted currency and capital controls, effectively walling itself off from the rest of Asia.

The economic crisis severely impacted the Malaysian conglomerate and it went home to try to revive its finances. Its grand plans for Angkor Wat came to nothing. The economic crisis had saved what would arguably have been Angkor Wat's destruction.

Today, as tourists return post-Covid to gaze at the wonder of Angkor Wat, they should say a quick thank you to one of the silver linings of the Asian Economic Crisis.

The shadowy Chinese firms that own chunks of Cambodia

October 2023

Minimum Housing Standards Commence in Queensland

September 20, 2023 Edward Dever

From 1 September 2023, any new residential lease in Queensland or lease renewal is subject to the new minimum housing standards requirements. All remaining leases will be subject to the requirements from 1 September 2024.

Some of the requirements such as adequate plumbing and drainage, connected water supply and a functioning toilet seem obvious to most landlords.

However, these requirements, together with items such as functioning latches or locks on external doors and windows, effectively place an onus on the agent and owner to confirm compliance prior to any new lease or lease renewal.

There are already examples of agents advising owners they will not lease properties that, in their view, do not comply with the minimum housing standards.

Tenants have a variety of remedies where a residential rental property does not meet the minimum housing standards.

These include ending the tenancy within seven days of occupying the property, requesting emergency repairs, or applying to QCAT for a repair or termination order.

Minimum housing standards fact sheet – general tenancies

September 2023

Rent Freeze Proposal Gets Frozen Out At National Cabinet

August 24, 2023 Edward Dever

Landlords could be forgiven for feeling a little confused, particularly those with investment properties in different States.

Last week, National Cabinet ruled out imposing any form of rent freeze as demanded by The Greens.

The Greens proposal involves a nationwide two year rent freeze followed by a maximum 2% increase every two years thereafter with no end date.

Then it gets a little confusing.

For example, in Queensland, the Greens Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation (Rent Freeze) Amendment Bill provides for rents to be frozen as at 1 August 2022. Qld Parliament's Community Support and Services Committee has recommended against passing the Bill.

The Greens NSW Rent Freeze Bill specifies 30 June 2023 as the relevant date. The NSW Bill is silent on what happens after the initial two year rent freeze.

The Greens Federal Freeze on Rent and Rate Increases Bill stipulates that rents will be frozen as at 1 January 2023.

Instead of a nationwide rent freeze or rent caps, National Cabinet prefers a nationally consistent policy on renters’ rights including reasonable grounds for eviction, minimum rental standards, and limiting rent rises to once every 12 months.

Many of these outcomes have already been implemented in Queensland. New minimum housing standards rules come into effect in Queensland for new tenancies on 1 September 2023.

Meanwhile, The Greens are softening their stance, with their chief spokesperson on the issue moving away from a strict rent freeze to some form of rent cap.

Even The Greens-promoted polling from The Australia Institute shows only minority support for a rent freeze among voters from all parties, including The Greens.

Some landlords may take comfort from the statements following National Cabinet, thinking the rent freeze saga is at an end.

Others may continue to raise rents disproportionately on the basis that, while the issue may be dead, it is not buried and some form of rent freeze may still be forthcoming.

Meanwhile, The Greens will continue to campaign on the issue of rents and the Prime Minister is no closer to passing his housing bill.

Stories of rogue agents and massive rent increases at the current hearings of the Federal housing inquiry will keep the issue in the headlines.

From public holidays to rental freeze and housing supply, National Cabinet showed there are limits to Anthony Albanese's power

August 2023